"We are a crippled old ship, rushed out before our engine room was really efficient. We are now unable to condense water quickly enough and cannot steam more than ten knots. So we crawl south…Our shooting was rotten." Ship’s doctor of HMS Kent, (Castles of Steel, 2003 by Robert K. Massie, at page 277)

As the French navy fell further behind the Royal Navy in construction of battleships in the last two decades of the 19th Century, some French officers devised ways to overcome their numerical inferiority. Called the "Jeune Ecole" the Young School , these officers thought outside of the box to develop new strategies to overcome the British preponderance in numbers. One path was to develop small, cheap ships that could sink expensive battleships and the torpedo boat came into vogue. With the development and production of the new British torpedo-boat destroyers as a type, it was thought that the Royal Navy had overcome the threat of masses of French torpedo boats. "Given three years without complications, I trust that in the great requirements – men, ships, and works – the needs of this Navy for its efficient service will have been met, and the office of the panic-mongers will be gone." (First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Frederick Richards, February 2 1897, The Anatomy of British Seapower, 1940, by Arthur Marder, at page 282) However, the French had another axis in their two pronged approach.

This path was centered around the destruction of British commerce or "Guerre de Course". The Confederate Navy had been very successful during the American Civil War in dispatching raiders to attack Union merchant and whaling fleets and the depredations of CSS Alabama, CSS Shenandoah and other raiders caused such destruction and reflagging of vessels to other countries that the American merchant marine never recovered. However, the object of this strategy was not to starve Great Britain of food imported from overseas. The target was financial. The goal was to destroy enough merchantmen that the insurance on the rest of the merchantmen would skyrocket and cause economic chaos in Great Britain . However, for the French to send out raiders against the British merchant marine would require a different type of ship. The Royal Navy had many scout and protected cruisers operating on the British trade routes, normally classified as 2nd rate or 3rd rate cruisers. What was needed was a ship that could overcome a typical British trade protection cruiser. To achieve this result cruiser designs were given an armored belt, which became the distinguishing feature of the armored cruiser type and so began the Cult of the Armored Cruiser

Russia also chose to produce large armored cruisers and it was the Russian cruisers as well as the large French armored cruiser building program that imposed somewhat of a panic in the Royal Navy. Scout cruisers had no armor and protected cruisers had only an armored deck with no side armor. In theory these French and Russian armored cruisers could shrug off hits from the British cruisers, destroy them and continue to wreak destruction among British merchantmen. The Royal Navy had built a handful of armored cruisers in the past but all previous designs were slow and had other significant defects. As the year 1897 went into the spring, the complacency of their Lordships of the Admiralty was disturbed by a new French building program. France had already started building armored cruisers when she ordered six more armored cruisers with another for 1898, plus three corsair cruisers, unarmored but very fast (23 knot) ships specifically designed to destroy commerce.

"On May 1, 1897 the D.N.I. prepared a memorandum on the new French cruiser policy. Everything, he remarked, pointed to the creation by France of a class of vessels superior to those which formed the bulk of their foreign or trade protecting squadrons in war." (The Anatomy of British Seapower, 1940, by Arthur Marder, at page 284) The alarm bells had sounded in the hallowed halls of the Admiralty. What the Royal Navy needed were armored cruisers with sufficient speed, armor and gun power to overcome the French and Russian designs. "Under construction we have twenty armoured cruisers. In the Fleet at present we can number no modern vessels of this important type, though France and Russia have added many to their navies in the past few years. When it was decided to follow in the footsteps of our two rivals, Lord Goschen did not fail to confide to the House of Commons that the need for these ships was urgent, and that no effort should be spared to add as many of them as was necessary to the Fleet at the earliest possible moment. Early in the summer of 1897 the first four of the Cressy class, of 12,000 tons, were provided for in the Supplementary Estimate." (Naval Annual 1901, The Past Five Years’ Warship-Building by Archibald S. Hurd, at page 261-262)

The first class of new armored cruisers was the Cressy class. Comprised of six ships, the Cresseys could easily be distinguished by the multitude of J-shape funnels blooming from their decks. Armed with two 9.2-inch and twelve 6-inch guns, they seemed to be adequately armed but they were too slow. With a top speed of 21 knots, it would be difficult to run down opposing cruisers of similar speed. The next class addressed that need. The four Drake class were huge ships at the time. Displacing over 14,000 tons and armed with two 9.2-inch and sixteen 6-inch guns, these ships were fast with a top speed of 23-knots but they were expensive and required crews significantly larger than contemporary British battleships because of their large increase in machinery. What was needed was a class of armored cruisers that were smaller, more economical to build and more economical to man to be built in quantity. The solution was the County Class armored cruiser. Compared to the preceding Drake class, the ships of the County class were 1/3 smaller in displacement, shorter, had a thinner armored belt, and reduced the guns carried. The armament was fourteen 6-inch guns with four mounted in twin turrets and five mounted per side in casemates. However, they were not to sacrifice speed as they were also designed for a top speed of 23 knots. 

Profile, Plan & Quarter View
ken7390.JPG (68644 bytes) ken7400.JPG (66494 bytes) ken7397.JPG (71961 bytes) ken7394.JPG (71686 bytes)
ken7404.JPG (105901 bytes) ken7412.JPG (142893 bytes) ken7409.JPG (99738 bytes) ken7406.JPG (86864 bytes)
ken7417.JPG (107124 bytes) ken7418.JPG (105633 bytes) ken7422.JPG (94338 bytes) ken7425.JPG (81150 bytes)

"If in the battleship classes other navies have followed our lead, in the Cressy class we have followed the example of the Russian and other navies by adopting the belt for the protection of the vitals of the ship, instead of depending, as we have done hitherto, on a protective deck." (The Naval Annual 1899, 1899, Recent Warship Construction by T.A. Brassey, Chapter VI, at page 182) In the same volume appeared the text of the First Lord’s Memorandum of March 7, 1899. After describing the armored cruisers of the Cressy and Drake classes, First Lord George J. Goschen mentioned a new class of cruiser. "Two other cruisers were included in the Supplemental Programme. They will be of a new design, and tenders have been invited for their construction. Their principal features are as follows: - Length between perpendiculars, 440 ft. ; breath, extreme, 66 ft.; mean draught, 24 ½ ft.; displacement, 9,800 tons; speed (with natural draught), 23 knots; I.H.P., 22,000. Armament: fourteen 6-in. Q.-F. guns, four in turrets, ten in casemates; ten 12-pdr. Q.-F. guns, three 3-pdr., two torpedo tubes. The 6-in. guns will be of the latest type, and will be protected by armour about 4-in. thick. Vertical side armour of the same thickness will be carried over a considerable portion of the length, with thinner armour on the bows. Strong protective decks will be associated with this side armour." (The Naval Annual 1899, 1899, First Lord’s Memorandum by George J. Goschen First Lord of the Admiralty, at page 424)

The London Times was enthusiastic over the new, smaller cruiser design. They were specifically compared against the protected cruisers of the Diadem class. "These remarkable cruisers are to be 440 ft. in length and 66 ft. in breadth, with their displacement of 9,800 tons, and will be armed with fourteen 6-in. Q.F. guns, ten of which will be in casemate, and two forward and two aft on twin mountings. They will also have six 12-pr. Q.F. guns amidships on the main deck, and two forward and two aft on the upper deck. Thus, on a 1,00-ton less displacement they will be provided with two fewer 6-in. and four fewer 12-pr. Guns than the Diadem class; but they will have many compensating advantages, as not only will they be armoured, but they will have a speed of 23 knots, against 20 ½ knots in the Diadems." (Naval Annual 1900, page 15) However, within a few years, as the first two ships underwent trials, it was discovered that the design calculations were not met.

Although designed for 23-knots, the initial ships of the County class did not live up to their design. "The County class includes ten ships of 9800 tons, and six of 10,700 tons displacement. The estimated speed of the former is 23 knots with 22,000 I.H.P. They have so far failed to attain their contract speed, although the designed horse-power has been exceeded. The failure has been attributed to the unsuitability of the propellers. The changes made in the propellers of the Kent has not had the desired effect, , though better results may still be attained. " (Naval Annual 1903, page 5) Tests at full power reported Bedford with a speed of 22.7-knots at full power of 22,457ihp, while Kent was a knot slower with 21.7-knots at full power of 22,249ihp. The new propellers only increased the speed of Kent to 21.89-knots. The 1903 Annual also stated, "The weakness of these ships is in their waterline protection." In the armor section the belt armor of the County class is criticized. "Even the Monmouth, with her 4-in. belt, which can be riddled by the 6.4-in. French gun at nearly 5,000 yards range, has a 1 ¼-in. main deck some 60 ft. broad, the weight of which would have allowed the belt and casemates to be sufficiently thickened to make the vitals and guns safe from the 6.4-in. shot until the ships closed to 1500 yds. And the smallest gun by which the Monmouth is likely to be attacked is the 5.5-in., which will pierce her belt and casemates at over 3000 yds. As in the battleships, were the armour removed from the main belt, there is nothing that could be materially injured by pieces of shell passing downwards through a thin deck, whilst the top of the belt is so high above the water that there would be little trouble owing to admission of water. It will be very poor satisfaction to the stokers, who, whilst tending the fires, will run the greatest risk from splinters of shot which are liable to enter the stokehold, after piercing belt and ‘armoured’ deck (3/4-in.!), to learn that their clothes, which are stowed immediately beneath the main deck, are safe from the effect of bursting shells….It may not be too late to transfer some of the comparatively useless plating of the main deck of the County class to the slopes of the lower deck. The 4-in. belt can scarcely be modified, but would it not be possible to substitute 5-in. for 4-in. casemates in the ships which are not to be completed till next year?" (Naval Annual 1903, page 353)  

Hull Detail
ken7431.JPG (75966 bytes) ken7428.JPG (70891 bytes) ken7430.JPG (86336 bytes) ken7432.JPG (89994 bytes)
ken7435.JPG (82250 bytes) ken7433.JPG (80013 bytes) ken7436.JPG (83032 bytes) ken7437.JPG (64012 bytes)

Kent and Essex were ordered in the supplementary estimates for 1898-1899 with Monmouth and Bedford closely following in the 1899-1900 Program and the last six in the 1900-1901 Program. However, HMS Monmouth was the first to be laid down on August 29, 1899 at the class became officially known as the Monmouth class. As more modern designs joined the fleet, the ships of the Monmouth class were assigned to foreign stations. In this they were fulfilling the role originally envisioned for them, trade route protection. Because of the lack of any guns heavier than a six-incher, Jackie Fisher commented, "Sir William White designed the ‘County’ class but forgot the guns". HMS Kent was laid down at Portsmouth on February 12, 1900. She was the third of the class to be laid down but was the first to be launched on March 6, 1901. She also was the first to be completed on October 1, 1903.

The armored cruiser craze lasted less than a decade for by 1906 a new type of warship appeared that ended construction of the armored cruiser. This was the battlecruiser. Although HMS Invincible was originally typed as an armored cruiser, her 12-inch gun main armament clearly eclipsed the previous cruiser designs and after a few years the term battlecruiser was coined to describe this new type. Armored cruisers only years old had suddenly became as obsolescent in the face of the Invincible as the predreadnought battleships became with the arrival of HMS Dreadnought. Before long many were placed in reserve, especially the older types. With the coming of World War One they were dusted off and sent back to sea with reserve crews and HMS Kent was one of these.

When Japan joined the allies against Germany , her primary goal was to seize the German possessions in Asia . One prize was the port of Tsing-Tao in China , which was home of the German Asiatic Squadron. Commanded by Admiral Graf von Spee, this force was composed of two excellent armored cruisers, Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, as well as five scout cruisers. Although this was a formidable force with superbly trained crews, it certainly was no match for the entire Imperial Japanese Navy. Von Spee steamed out of port and disappeared into the Pacific. The Royal Navy and Japanese Navy sent out squadrons to locate the Asiatic Squadron and Kit Cradock’s cruisers were assigned the South Atlantic . Cradock wanted the modern armored cruiser HMS Defence assigned to strengthen his squadron but th is was refused and Cradock was ordered to reconnoiter the coast of Chile in the Pacific. So off went Kit with Good Hope, Monmouth, the scout cruiser Glasgow and auxiliary cruiser Otranto. He also had the predreadnought battleship Canopus but it was reported to Cradock that she was only capable of twelve knots. This was unfortunate, because this old battleship was capable of sixteen knots. Based on the faulty information about Canopus , Cradock left the battleship behind in his search for von Spee. On October 31, 1914 Cradock met von Spee 50 miles west of the Chilean port of Coronel . As night was falling both of Cradock’s cruisers were reduced to wrecks. Good Hope blew up in the night but a critically damaged Monmouth broke contact with the German armored cruisers and tried to struggle to safety. However, she was discovered by the light cruiser SMS Nurnburg. The light cruiser pumped 75 4-inch shells into Monmouth until she capsized. 

Hull Detail
ken7438.JPG (70099 bytes) ken7439.JPG (65702 bytes) ken7440.JPG (86152 bytes) ken7442.JPG (86683 bytes)
ken7443.JPG (76307 bytes) ken7444.JPG (98407 bytes) ken7445.JPG (113436 bytes) ken7446.JPG (75520 bytes)

While her sistership was succumbing to German fire, HMS Kent was cruising peacefully off another continent, preparing for another dawn. Kent had been assigned the duty of patrolling off of the west coast of Africa . She had only been put back into service at the start of October and 3/5ths of her crew were reservists. In crossing the Bay of Biscay in mid-October, half the crew was seasick. As the Admiralty first learned of the disaster of Colonel , Kent was off the coast of Sierra Leone . She was immediately ordered to join the South Atlantic squadron at Albrolhos Rock off of Brazil . On November 28, 1914 the squadron now under the command of Rear Admiral Sturdee who had arrived with the battle cruisers on November 26. All of the ships needed firing practice but especially the older armored cruisers, which had put to sea with scratch crews. On November 30 the squadron had firing practice and Kent and Carnarvon took turns towing targets for each other. Kent expended 144 rounds in an attempt to sharpen her gunner’s skills. Sturdee’s squadron arrived at the Falkland Islands late on December 7. The squadron needed coaling so all of the big ships, except Kent went to the outer harbor of Port William and shut down their boilers for maintenance and coaling. Kent was tasked to stay in the outer harbor with her steam up. She had been designated as a sentry. The auxiliary cruiser Macedonia had the duty until 08:00 December 8 and Kent was ordered to relieve her that morning. That morning would bring von Spee instead.

Von Spee at 5:30 a.m. had detached Gneisenau and Nurnberg to reconnoiter the Port Stanley and Port William anchorages. The weather, which was normally misty, rainy or occluded with sleet or snow in the area of the Falklands was abnormally clear and bright that morning. The Germans were sighted at more than ten miles from Sapper Hill. At 8:45 the smoke of the rest of the German squadron was reported as coming up behind the first two ships. When the Germans were spotted Sturdee ordered Kent to cover the harbor entrance, cover Macedonia and observe the Germans until the British force could get steam up and leave harbor. As the Kent neared the harbor entrance, smoke from the two German ships could be seen over a spit of land. The Gneisenau had spotted the Kent leaving harbor and it was thought the cruiser was trying to escape. As Gneisenau was steering towards Kent to engage, a round hit her from an unseen assailant, the Canopus . Because the Kent hadn’t fired and the Germans were well outside the range of the six-inch guns on the County Class cruiser, it was guessed that there was something big and dangerous in the harbor. With the hit the Germans turned to rejoin the rest of their squadron. Without this hit the Germans had the opportunity to close the British force. They certainly could have overwhelmed the Kent and perhaps damage the immobile ships sufficiently to allow the German squadron to escape. 

Hull Detail
ken7448.JPG (74091 bytes) ken7449.JPG (72611 bytes) ken7450.JPG (77246 bytes) ken7460.JPG (71614 bytes)
ken7451.JPG (75486 bytes) ken7452.JPG (75921 bytes) ken7453.JPG (65910 bytes) ken7454.JPG (105651 bytes)
ken7455.JPG (70890 bytes) ken7456.JPG (82393 bytes) ken7457.JPG (73753 bytes) ken7458.JPG (75675 bytes)

The solitary Kent was finally joined by the light cruiser Glasgow at 0945. At 0950 the rest of Sturdee’s squadron weighed anchor and headed for sea. However, it would not be until 10:30 that they were assembled and ready for pursuit. When the squadron took off after the German Asiatic Squadron, it was lead by Glasgow , followed by Kent . However, it was not long before the battle cruisers passed the old armored cruiser. Sturdee signaled "General Chase" and the HMS Kent responded magnificently. A disappointment on her trials and known as the slowest of the Counties, the stokers of the Kent worked wonders. Kent was ordered to fall back and take station off the port quarter of Invincible. Kent proved to be the fastest of the armored cruisers that morning as the Carnarvon limped along at 18-knots and Cornwall managed 22-knots. At 12:20 Sturdee opened the engagement with his battle cruisers. Aboard Inflexible cheers could be heard coming from Kent as the battle cruisers opened fire. Kent had to bide her time as the range was too great for her 6-inch battery. For an hour it was the two British battle cruisers against the two German armored cruisers, as all of the other ships were outside of gunnery range. At 1320 von Spee saw that he could not shake the battle cruisers, so he ordered his light cruisers to break away and escape. His armored cruisers would engage the British to allow the lighter ships a chance to survive.

As the German light cruisers separated from the heavier ships, the British followed the battle plan that had been established more than a week before. That plan called for the battle cruisers to take on the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau and the other British cruisers to tackle the German light cruisers. Following this plan Glasgow , Kent and Cornwall took off after the three German light cruisers, Leipzig , Nurnberg and Dresden . At this point the Germans had a ten to twelve mile lead. The sluggish Carnarvon, ten miles behind, continued trudging after the battle cruisers. For more than two hours the armored cruisers chased the lighter German ships. Only Glasgow possessed the speed to close quickly but she couldn’t take on three cruisers at once. The German ships would have been faster but after four months at sea their hulls were foul and their machinery creaky from constant use. At 15:45 the German cruisers parted from each other. Dresden , the lead ship turned southwest, Nurnberg turned east and the trailing Leipzig continued on the original southern course. It was decided that two birds in the hand were worth three in the bush and the Dresden was not followed as she still had a substantial lead. While Glasgow and Cornwall continued after Leipzig , Kent turned to follow Nurnberg

The performance of the engine crew of HMS Kent during her chase of Nurnberg was nothing short of spectacular. The Kent could not hit 22 knots at her trials more than a decade earlier, when she was fresh from the builders, and yet she had to be told to fall back by Sturdee in the general chase. By 11:00 that morning Kent was already hitting the original designed speed of 23-knots. As she chased after Dresden at 16:00 that afternoon the old, worn out Kent, who could only crawl along at ten knots a month earlier, hit 24-knots, only a knot less than the battle cruisers. Captain Allen thought that his command had actually achieved 25-knots as her ihp was exceeded by 5,000ihp. Since Kent had been selected as guard ship, she had kept her steam up and not coaled. As a result, during the chase she was short of coal. To make up for this shortage the enthusiastic crew tore apart anything wooden to feed the fires of the ship’s boilers. Ladders, doors, officer’s furniture, the chaplain’s lectern, the paymaster’s desk and even deck planking went into the fires to allow Kent to close the distance with Nurnberg . However, it paid off and Kent closed the distance. By 17:00 the range was 11,000 yards. Nurnberg fired with her aft 4.1-inch guns and Kent opened up with her forward turret guns but the shells fell short. By 17:09 Kent was in range and fired continuously. The long range firing seemed to get no results but at 17:35 Nurnberg suffered a mechanical failure. The worn machinery could not take the extended stress of operating at top speed. Two boilers burst from salt condensation and Nurnberg ’s ability to flee disappeared.

The final engagement resembled two mismatched pugilists in a prizefight. The Nurnberg had a lighter punch with her 4.1-inch guns but her gun crews were highly trained through years of service on that ship and the fact that the Dresden was part of the best firing squadron in the German Navy. She could land punches faster and in greater quantity. On the other hand the Kent was a much heavier opponent. Unlike the nimble, precise Dresden , which was the boxer of the two, the Kent was a bar room brawler. Her green gun crews could not hope to match the precision and quickness of the German gun crews. However, her 6-inch guns were rib crushers, capable chewing apart the light German ship if she could score enough hits. The key to this was to get in close to punch the guts out of the German ship. When Kent had trimmed the range to 7,000 yards, Nurnberg turned broadside to finish the duel. Kent with her belt armor continued to close to 3,000 yards. As Kent bored in, most of the German shells could not penetrate Kent ’s armor. Contrary to the earlier observation of the Kent ’s chaplain, the armored cruiser scored hit after hit on her lighter opponent. However, Nurnberg still scored damaging hits. One shell wrecked a 6-inch casemate position and another shell wrecked the Kent ’s radio room. The casemate strike could have been disastrous. The 4.1-inch shell burst upon hitting the A3 casemate and ignited charges inside the gun position. A flash of flame followed down the ammunition handling trunk but Sergeant Charles Mayes at the bottom of the trunk threw away the open charge at the bottom of the trunk and flooded the compartment. Without that action Captain Allen stated in his after action report that it was entirely possible that the flash could have set up a chain reaction until it reached the magazine, blowing up the ship. The Royal Navy failed to learn from this event, as the losses of RN battle cruisers and armored cruisers to magazine explosions at Jutland were to prove. 

Smaller Resin Parts
ken7463.JPG (119197 bytes) ken7464.JPG (99752 bytes) ken7466.JPG (93847 bytes) ken7468.JPG (71641 bytes)
ken7469.JPG (66606 bytes) ken7470.JPG (63274 bytes) ken7471.JPG (66469 bytes) ken7473.JPG (72820 bytes)
ken7474.JPG (70624 bytes) ken7475.JPG (90600 bytes) ken7478.JPG (92362 bytes) ken7480.JPG (101999 bytes)

The body blows of the 6-inch guns of Kent quickly made a shambles of Nurnberg . Funnels and the mainmast were lost, guns were disabled and by 18:25 Nurnberg was dead in the water. In ten more minutes the last German gun was silenced and Kent ceased fire. As Kent waited alongside the burning Nurnberg , the German cruiser still flew her flag. Kent resumed firing at 18:57 and Nurnberg finally lowered her colors. " Kent closed in through the mist and saw the flames dancing above the light cruiser’s deck and shooting out from portholes and jagged holes in the hull. The rain pattering on the decks and hissing into the fires had little effect because it was accompanied by gusts of wind that fanned the flames more than the rain quenched them." (Castles of Steel, 2003 by Robert K. Massie, at page 278) Kent patched two boats and quickly launched them to recover survivors. At 19:27 the Nurnberg turned over and went down by the bow. Crewmen on Kent threw ropes over the cruisers sides, hoping that some of the German crew could make use of them. Searchlights illuminated the scene in an effort to increase the odds of the British boats and German survivors sighting each other. The water was intensely cold and seas were gathering. Hypothermia undoubtedly rapidly ran through the ranks of German survivors. The British continued their rescue mission past 21:00. The results were meager. Twelve Germans were rescued but five subsequently died of their exposure. Only seven of a crew of 400 were saved and Otto von Spee, son of the squadron commander was not among them.

Kent had won her fight and avenged the Monmouth but did take casualties. The Nurnberg had scored 37 4.1-inch hits but the design theories behind the armored cruiser concept had been proven. The armor of Kent was never penetrated. The armored cruiser had come into being to run down and destroy marauding commerce destroyers, and that is exactly what Kent had accomplished. Emden had already shown how dangerous and destructive the German light cruisers of the Asiatic Squadron could be. Kent lost four dead and twelve wounded. The next morning the ship was enveloped in a thick fog and the captain could not ascertain her location. She could pick up radio transmissions but could not send them. All day Kent heard calls trying to raise her but could not respond. Since Sturdee did not hear from Kent , he thought the ship might have been lost and made for her last known position with his battle cruisers. It was not until the afternoon of December 9 that Invincible received a message from Macedonia that Kent had appeared off Port Stanley . After repairs Kent was sent to the Pacific in the search for the sole surviving German ship, Dresden

Smaller Resin Parts
ken7482.JPG (113926 bytes) ken7484.JPG (92950 bytes) ken7486.JPG (178127 bytes) ken7487.JPG (82044 bytes)
ken7489.JPG (92278 bytes) ken7491.JPG (165678 bytes) ken7492.JPG (73894 bytes) ken7493.JPG (62658 bytes)
ken7495.JPG (111753 bytes) ken7496.JPG (187403 bytes) ken7500.JPG (190831 bytes) ken7503.JPG (90592 bytes)

For three months Kent was engaged in her fruitless mission of seeking Dresden . The British intercepted a German telegram ordering colliers to rendezvous with Dresden 300 miles west of Coronel on March 5, 1915 and Kent was directed to close this location. Kent found nothing but on the afternoon of March 8, Kent spotted the Dresden at the range of 12 miles. Again Kent took off in pursuit of the last surviving cruiser of von Spee’s squadron. Kent worked up to 21-knots but could not repeat the heroic performance of December 8. Undoubtedly her machinery was strained from her performance during the chase of Nurnberg and in was unable to come to grips with the faster German cruiser. Dresden had disappeared over the horizon for an hour and as night descended with the Kent short of coal, Kent had to break off the chase. The next day Dresden put into Cumberland Bay in Chile . The cruiser only had 100 tons of coal left and when told by authorities that the ship had to leave in 24 hours and could not await colliers, Dresden ’s captain decided he had no choice but to be interned by Chile . Dresden was still flying her flag at that location on March 14 when she was closed by Kent, Glasgow and Orama. Kent came in from the east while the other two lighter ships came in from the west. The British force had been ordered to destroy the Dresden , rather than see her interned and with no Chilean warships present, steamed into Chilean waters to finish the German cruiser. At a range of 8,400 yards Glasgow opened fire on the anchored Dresden at 08:50, followed shortly after by Kent . The Dresden could neither fight nor flee, however, she did open fire at the overwhelming British force. Within three minutes British shell strikes had so damaged the Dresden that she lowered her flag. Captain Ludecke of Dresden sent Lieutenant Canaris, later Admiral Canaris head of intelligence for the Kriegsarine, in a boat to Glasgow to parlay. This was done just to gain time to allow the Dresden to be scuttled. In addition to haggling with Canaris, Captain Luce also had to issue apologies to the Chilean governor because his boat had been fired upon by the British during the short engagement with Dresden . In the meantime the German crew was transported ashore and sea cocks and underwater torpedo doors on Dresden were opened. At 10:45 the forward magazine of Dresden exploded. As the ship settled by the bow, the German crew on shore cheered their ship and the crew of Kent lined her rails and also cheered the Dresden .

The rest of the war had to be an anticlimax for the crew of Kent . The Counties were designed to be trade protection cruisers, a role in which HMS Kent excelled. Larger armored cruisers were also designed for fleet work. It was the bigger cruisers that suffered catastrophic losses at Jutland . Of the 35 armored cruisers built to seven designs, it is ironic that the most successful of the breed would be one of the discredited Counties, whose lack of any gun bigger than a 6-inch was ridiculed by Jackie Fisher and others. However, the Counties proved their worth. Only Monmouth was lost to enemy action and that was against a superior force. In marked contrast none of the 19 RN armored cruisers mounting 9.2-inch guns sank anything and eight of their number were sunk in action against the German Navy. The Counties served everywhere patrolling the long sea routes of Great Britain and serving as convoy escorts. Kent destroyed one cruiser and took part in sinking another. Cornwall also took part in sinking another cruiser. After the war HMS Kent was sold in 1920 and broken up. (History from: (The Anatomy of British Seapower, 1940, by Arthur Marder; Castles of Steel, 2003 by Robert K. Massie: Coronel and the Falklands, 1962 by Geoffrey Bennett; The Naval Annual 1899, 1899, Recent Warship Construction by T.A. Brassey, Chapter VI; The Naval Annual 1899, 1899, First Lord’s Memorandum by George J. Goschen First Lord of the Admiralty; Naval Annual 1900; Naval Annual 1901, The Past Five Years’ Warship-Building by Archibald S. Hurd; Naval Annual 1903;

Smaller Resin Parts
ken7504.JPG (72897 bytes) ken7506.JPG (194997 bytes) ken7507.JPG (84124 bytes) ken7509.JPG (162420 bytes)
ken7511.JPG (162245 bytes) ken7513.JPG (209095 bytes) ken7514.JPG (178876 bytes) ken7517.JPG (185582 bytes)
ken7518.JPG (78907 bytes) ken7520.JPG (151994 bytes) ken7523.JPG (129115 bytes) ken7525.JPG (73128 bytes) ken7527.JPG (74643 bytes)

The Combrig 1:350 Scale Kent
With their 1:350 scale HMS Kent, Combrig has released the only British armored cruiser commercially available. With the review of the 1:350 scale Combrig Danton, some commented that the Combrig Danton looked like an enlarged version of the 1:700 scale Combrig Danton. Those statements were true but what was wrong with that? With the Danton, I guess the metal deck plate patterns and funnel seams could have been included with the detail on the 1:350 scale kit. For the Kent , it too can be seen as an enlarged version of the 1:700 scale Combrig Kent. Again, what is wrong with that? With the Kent there are ways in which Combrig could have improved their 1:350 scale release over their 1:700 release. The two areas that jump to mind involve hull side detail. The hull anchor hull hawse could have been opened and more importantly is the detail of the hull 6-inch casemates. As with the 1:700 scale version, the 1:350 Kent comes with shutters closed, requiring the modeler to drill the location point for the 6-inch gun barrel. In 1:350 scale it would have been better to have the casemate positions open and to have included separate photo-etch shutters, thereby allowing the modeler the option to build the gun positions with open or shut shutters. However, that being said, I like the detail on the Combrig 1:350 scale Kent . As can be said with the Combrig 1:350 scale Danton, don’t hold your breath waiting for some company to release an injected version of either class.

Hull Detail
With British armored cruisers you’re guaranteed a high freeboard and the Combrig Kent doesn’t disappoint. The hull casting starts with a fine ram bow with a sharp cutwater. As is true with all 1:350 scale Combrig kits, there is a rein overpour extending below the waterline. This will involve patient removal. The waterline is very clearly defined but don’t rush removal of the overpour. Use a Dremmel to get close to the waterline but finish with sandpaper. That way you won’t accidently cut into the actual hull and will have a nice, smooth waterline. There are two hull anchor hawse to starboard and one to port. The raised oval hawse fittings are present but as mentioned above, the hawse interior aren’t opened. In 1:350 scale it would indeed have been better to have these opened, allowing the modeler to insert the anchor stocks inside the hawse fittings. The forecastle has a significant hull flare, which reduced the amount of water taken over the forecastle. Just aft of the anchor hawse is a secondary gun position with a cut in embrasure to allow end on fire. The gun barrel locator hull will have to be drilled. Likewise when you get to the signature double storey primary gun casemates the curving hull flattens to for a cut-in embrasure. The gun positions have closed shutters. As mentioned above, in 1:350 scale, it would have been preferable to have open gun positions with separate shutters. Barrel locator holes will need to be drilled for all casemate 6-inch guns. Amidship, the top of the hull has three notches on each side at the locations of the secondary guns. The single main gun casemate has the correct flat V shape, again presented with closed shutters. Aft is the second double storey with closed shutters and a flat embrasure allowing for aft end on fire and another single secondary gun embrasure at the very stern. 

Brass Photo-Etch Fret
ken7531.JPG (143411 bytes) ken7534.JPG (111468 bytes) ken7535.JPG (111111 bytes)
ken7536.JPG (142267 bytes) ken7537.JPG (152094 bytes) ken7538.JPG (147904 bytes)
ken7539.JPG (140517 bytes) ken7540.JPG (149089 bytes) ken7541.JPG (134341 bytes)

Deck detail is plentiful. The forecastle has two open chocks on each side and a twin bollard fitting with the correct hour glass profile, rather than the straight post profile as used by other manufacturers. Of course the forecastle, weather deck and quarterdeck all have wood planking but without butt ends. The flat metal anchor chain run plates, going from the chain locker entrance to the deck hawse add a nice contrast to the wooden decks. The deck hawse could have been cast with deeper openings, so it will present a better appearance to drill them out with the hull hawse to allow chain to run through to the anchors. Numerous locator holes are present for the anchor windlasses and other separate forecastle fittings. Between the forward barbette and superstructure locator well are two large cast on fittings. One is a skylight with port hole detail and deck access fitting with door opening wheel detail. Amidship deck detail centers around the three deck houses that are the base for each funnel. Each one is different from the others. There are seven deck coamings. One offset deck access coaming is to port but the rest are centerline. Two small and one large deck access coming are on centerline but the largest coaming has a mixture of access doors and ventilator doors. As with the forecastle, opening wheels are cast on each hull access door. There is one disappointment with the amidship deck detail, there are no coal scuttles. Combrig normally provides this detail. The fairly short quarterdeck has another four open chocks and two twin hourglass bollard fittings and five more coamings.

Smaller Resin Parts
British armored cruisers had minimal superstructure but there are still plentiful smaller resin parts. The largest of these are the three funnels. They have deep top openings, nice cap aprons but no segment band detail. Seam pipes are separate parts. Both twin turrets have shallow locator holes for the barrels, which are fine for resin barrels but if you get brass barrels, you may want to deepen the holes. Each turret has gun commander cupolas. You’ll have to remove a portion of the turret bottom stalks so that they will sit flush on the deck barbettes. Another separate part is the base deck house for the bridge. This horseshoe shaped part is fairly basic with porthole detail only. A thin sheet of resin contains an additional eleven parts. Largest of these is the decking for the aft superstructure. Cast on detail includes wooden planking, flag lockers, solid rear facing bulkhead and thin side bulkheads, replicating canvas covered railing. My preference is to remove the cast bulkheads and add photo-etch railings, leaving it either open railing or covering the railing with fine tissue or sheer cloth to replicate the canvas dodgers. Two smaller decks cover the forward deck houses. Each of these is of a different pattern and does not have the wooden planking, so apparently they represent metal decks. The sheet has the deck that rests atop the horseshoe deck house. 

Main Parts Dry-Fitted
kenD7553.JPG (142659 bytes) kenD7558.JPG (111776 bytes) kenD7561.JPG (122475 bytes) kenD7563.JPG (119628 bytes)
kenD7570.JPG (138029 bytes) kenD7573.JPG (114153 bytes) kenD7577.JPG (117167 bytes) kenD7582.JPG (107464 bytes)
kenD7583.JPG (128064 bytes) kenD7587.JPG (118329 bytes) kenD7593.JPG (138765 bytes) kenD7595.JPG (131798 bytes)

Cast on detail on this part includes deck planking and the armored conning tower. The conning tower has a vision slit at the top and the crown has locator lines for the support lattice on which rests the navigation bridge. The navigation bridge has the deck with wings and deck planking and the pilot house. The deck house has crisp square windows but the pilot house is solid, so the windows have to be painted. It would have been preferable to have an open deckhouse to allow clear bridge windows. Both the navigation deck and pilothouse deck have solid bulkheads representing canvas covered railing. As with the aft superstructure bulkheads, a better appearance will be had by removing the resin and replace with photo-etch railing. From the photographs you can see the only shipping damage incurred in that a part of the front face of the pilot house bulkhead is missing. For me at least, this is of no consequence, as I would replace all of these bulkheads with photo-etch railings. Six smaller parts on the sheet are the amidship catwalk, two control tops, two control top crowns and an open platform. These parts allow for a number of options because a different times, various members of the County class had different configurations, such as control top forward and open platform aft, control tops on both foremast and mainmast or control top forward, control top aft (lower on the mainmast that the top on the foremast) and an open platform above the control top.

Eleven resin runners contain the bulk of the smaller resin parts. The runner with largest parts has three slopping funnel base aprons, four hull side strakes and three nicely detailed anchors. Another runner has twelve excellent mushroom vents in three different patterns, a balsa raft and two deckhouses with crown door detail. These small deckhouses are placed fore and aft of the middle funnel. A small thick runner has two outstanding deck winches. I like photo-etch cable reels but their problem is cutting the hose reels to the right length to fit inside the reel frames. Combrig provides with their Kent a runner with separate cable reels in two patterns, so that you don’t have to cut hose cylinders from plastic rod. This runner also includes seven small drum ventilators, shaft skegs, binnacles and other navigation equipment. The fourteen six-inch gun barrels occupy a runner on their own. The muzzles do not have open barrels. Instead the barrels appear to have tampions, which were used to close the muzzle from the weather. Secondary guns are on a separate runner. This runner includes open deck guns with separate gun and cradle parts, barrels for the four hull secondary positions as well as small deck ventilators. Another runner has eight detailed searchlights. In my sample two of the searchlights had broken off from the mounts but are easily reattached. The four windlasses, three forward and one aft of a different design, are located on another runner. Lower foremast and main mast tubes are on another runner. Boat davits are on a runner but a few of these are warped. I have the waterline version of the Kent but it still came with a resin run of the rudder, shaft supports and propellers. Although moot to me, it is worthwhile noting that the propellers are not identical. Instead they have different blade angles on each propeller, accurately reflecting the fact that the blades on propeller were canted in an opposite angle from the blades on the other propeller to minimize torque. Each of the fourteen ship’s boats are cast on their individual runners. Two of these are steam launches in individual patterns with separate funnels. These are very nice with cast on skylights, deck houses, ventilators, access hatches, rudders and even coal scuttles. The open boats come in five sizes from the large whaleboat to small dinghies. Each of these has thwart and bottom planking detail. 

Main Parts Dry-Fitted
kenD7599.JPG (123783 bytes) kenD7565.JPG (118561 bytes) kenD7589.JPG (119370 bytes)
kenD7602.JPG (103123 bytes) kenD7603.JPG (70776 bytes) kenD7604.JPG (88225 bytes) kenD7605.JPG (88966 bytes)
kenD7606.JPG (99032 bytes) kenD7607.JPG (134025 bytes) kenD7609.JPG (78900 bytes) kenD7612.JPG (97059 bytes)

Brass Photo-Etch Fret
Combrig provides a photo-etch brass fret of ship specific parts. The modeler will have to provide after market photo-etch railing and inclined ladders, which is a must for this model. Most of the larger brass parts are the various raised boat skids found amidship. Five parts are navigation deck supports, three for the structure on the conning tower crown and separate supports for each bridge wing. Ten triangular supports are provided for the bottom of the control tops and open mast platform. Twenty boat cradles in different patterns are also on the fret. The fret is rounded out by a small cable reel, ship’s wheel and navigation map table.

The Combrig Kent instructions come on two back-printed pages. They are usable but could certainly be better. Page one has an essential plan and profile, statistics and short history written in English. The plan and profile is essential in order to specifically locate various parts, such as the separate hull strakes. The profile also serves in providing a standing rigging diagram. Page two is the standard resin parts laydown. Page three has a laydown of photo-etch parts and isometric view of initial hull assembly for the boat skids, catwalk and deck edge boat positions with a separate inset for the rudder, shaft supports, propeller, shafts and skegs. The last page contains the bulk of the assembly for everything else. Separate insets have details for secondary guns, turrets, tertiary guns, and a template for cutting mast yards. Always refer to the profile and plan for attaching parts, which do not have locator holes. 

Box & Instructions
kenR7373.jpg (87284 bytes) kenR7543.JPG (100075 bytes) kenR7545.JPG (100449 bytes) kenR7547.JPG (102678 bytes)
kenR7548.JPG (92017 bytes) kenR7550.JPG (113553 bytes) kenR7551.JPG (102437 bytes) kenR7552.JPG (109129 bytes)

From 1898 to 1905 the Royal Navy designed seven classes of armored cruisers. In less than a decade, in this period of armored cruiser mania, there were 35 British armored cruisers built. Ten of these were of the trade protection County Class. HMS Kent was one of these. With the Combrig 1:350 scale Kent , any modeler can build a resin and brass version of one of the victors of the Falklands