Tirpitz
always seems to be the poor relation when compared to the searing brightness of
the meteorically short career of
Bismarck
. Like a homely wallflower sister of a great beauty, Tirpitz
is always in the background while attention centers around the glamorous
Bismarck
. The Anglo-German Naval Treaty signed on June 18, 1935 allowed
Germany
to build up to 35% of the strength of the Royal Navy. Further
Germany
was bound to follow the restrictions of the 1922 Washington Treaty and 1930
London Treaty. These of course limited battleships to 35,000-tons. The naval
staff wanted a design mounting six 15-inch guns in three twin turrets but Hitler
did not want to antagonize the British and mandated that the new ships continue
to mount 11-inch guns. The new ships were to use armament, equipment and
fittings already ordered for the fourth and fifth panzerschiffes. Specifications
and plans were prepared but the start of construction was delayed until after
the Anglo-German naval treaty was signed and the ships were Scharnhorst
and Gneisenau.
The next pair, Bismarck
and Tirpitz,
upped the size of the main gun artillery had used a new design. The
Bismarck
380mm/47 guns had a range of 36,520m with 30 degrees elevation. Krupp designers
had also developed a 16-inch (406mm), which could have been selected for the
Bismarck
but selection of this gun would have lengthened construction time for further
development of turrets and gun trials. In interest of a speedy completion, the
380mm gun was ordered for the pair. German designers did consider triple and
even quadruple main gun turrets but the traditional twin gun turret was selected
for simplified ammunition stowage and delivery.
A new London naval limitation conference finished in
March 1936 and the agreement not only retained the 35,000-ton maximum
displacement, but also added a new wrinkle, that new construction was limited to
a main armament no greater than 14-inch guns. The new
Bismarck
battleship, which would be laid down four months later, would clearly violate
the terms of the new London Treaty, once completed on grounds of displacement
and main armament. However, the Treaty had an escalator clause, which stipulated
that maximum displacement could jump to 45,000-tons and main armament to 16-inch
guns if
Japan
and
Italy
had not signed the treaty by April 1, 1937. The German admirals felt confident
that neither power would sign the proposed treaty and accordingly gambled that
the
Bismarck
would be legal when completed under the escalator clause. There was the
standard deception about the true displacement of the ships but since the
escalator clause went into effect long before the guns were mounted or the ships
were completed, the
Bismarck
did not violate any international treaties. It is ironic that the German ships,
which actually violated international treaties were the panzerschiffes built
under the
Weimar
Republic
, while the Scharnhorst
and Bismarck
designs built under Hitler’s National Socialist regime fell within treaty
limitations. While
Germany
gambled that the treaty would not be signed,
Great Britain
went the other way and gambled that the treaty would be signed. The new British
design for the King George V class went with
the lighter 14-inch gun on a 35,000-ton design, although as completed they came
in at around 37,000-tons standard.
Bismarck
was laid down on July 1, 1936 by Blohm and Voss at
Hamburg
with the start of Tirpitz
following on October 20, 1936 by the Wilhelmshavn Navy Yard.
The
two sister ships did have differences. The area of the shelter deck was one area
in which the Bismarck and Tirpitz
were easily differentiated. The difference was in the area of the catapult. On
the
Bismarck
the edge of the shelter deck stopped short of the hull sides. On any overhead
photograph or plan, one can readily ascertain a strip of weather deck running
between the edge of the shelter deck and the hull sides. This is not so for Tirpitz.
On that ship the shelter deck in this area was expanded to run up to the edge of
the hull. This expansion runs from just aft of the second 5.9-inch turret on
each side to just aft of the catapult. With the
Bismarck
the second 4.1-inch AA mount on the shelter deck was partially masked by the
large aircraft/boat cranes that were mounted outboard on the weather deck to the
rear of the AA mount. The extension of the shelter deck on Tirpitz
allowed the second 4.1-inch to be mounted further outboard. The large cranes
were moved from the weather deck to the shelter deck and further it was moved
inboard of the AA mount. With this new arrangement these 4.1-inch guns were no
longer masked by the cranes. A new addition for Tirpitz
were torpedo tubes on each side just behind the shelter deck extensions because
these extensions also served to house torpedo reloads. In the summer of 1941 the
Tirpitz
received her quadruple 21-inch torpedo tubes at
Kiel
.
Another
area for difference between the two sisters was in her tertiary armament. The
pair had a new heavy AA gun installed in the form of a 4.1-inch/105mm twin
mount. However, the gun was developed before there was a mount designed
specifically for it. As a stop gap measure the mount for the smaller twin 88mm
AA gun was used for the heavier ordnance (C/31). As the
Bismarck
was fitting out, the forward four 105mm mounts were installed first. These
mounts were of the modified 88mm variety. Tirpitz
also had two of these makeshift mounts installed as the aft most 105mm mount on
each side. The new mount developed for the twin 105mm guns was the C/37. The aft
four 105mm positions on
Bismarck
were equipped with the new mounts at Gotenhafen during trials and Tirpitz
received the new mounts for the forward six positions. For the Tirpitz
the aft two gun positions with the modified 88mm C/31 mounts were subsequently
removed and replaced by C/37 mounts. However, the
Bismarck
never did replace the forward older modified C/31 mounts with the C/37 mounts
specifically designed for the 105mm guns. Although the mounts were superficially
similar to each other, they can easily be distinguished one from another. The
C/31 is smaller and shorter. It has raised conical fittings on each forward edge
and has open breach blocks. The much heftier C/37 is larger and higher with
sliding vision ports replacing the conical positions of the older mount. Instead
of angling backwards at a constant angle the sides of the newer mount veer
upwards sharply 2/3rds back from the front of the mount. Most noticeably,
splinter shielding is provided over the breach blocks on the newer mounts. Dragon
is right on the money with the correct mix for
Bismarck
and additional C/37 mounts for Tirpitz.
On the other hand, both the Trumpeter and Skywave kits provide four C/31 and
four C/37 mounts in both the Bismarck
and Tirpitz
kits. This is correct for
Bismarck
but this combination was never mounted by Tirpitz
and you’ll be short two C/37 mounts in her Baltic appearance and four C/37
mounts for her
Norway
deployment.
The completion of
Bismarck
had been little effected by British air attacks but for Tirpitz
it was a different story. Early in 1941 before ship was completed, Tirpitz
became a prime target in intensive aerial attack by the RAF. In five separate
attacks between January and March 1941 359 RAF bombers attacked the Tirpitz
at
Wilhelmshaven
. The attacks were by two engine medium bombers at night. Since Wilhemshaven was
a heavily defended port, these night attacks had no impact on Tirpitz.
On February 25, 1941 the Tirpitz
was commissioned. With the shafts disconnected, turbine tests were conducted at
the
Wilhelmshaven
basin from February 28 to March 6. Finally on March 9, 1941 Tirpitz
edged out of city of birth to traverse the
Kiel canal
. Her destination was Gotenhafen (Gydnia) in the eastern Baltic, where she would
undergo her trials. During the trip she hit 29 knots. For almost three months
the Tirpitz
was in the eastern Baltic testing all of her systems.
In
late May it was decided to send her back to
Kiel
to receive more fittings. When the ship had left
Wilhelmshaven
in March, she had steamed out of the range of the RAF but upon reaching
Kiel
, she again became a prime target of British aerial attack. In May, June and
September raids were conducted against Tirpitz
but as in the earlier attacks no hits were scored. On September 23, 1941 Tirpitz
again sailed eastward but this time it was assigned a combat mission. In June
1941
Germany
had invaded
Russia
and the mission of Tirpitz was to head the
Balttenflotte North Group. The mission was to prevent the Soviet Baltic Fleet
from breaking out into the Baltic. On September 24 she took on a Finnish liaison
officer to help the ship traverse the tricky approaches to Kronstadt, the Soviet
anchorage just west of
Leningrad
. Tirpitz
and Admiral
Scheer were going in after the Soviet fleet. However, after
battle damage assessment of the Luftwaffe attacks on the Soviet fleet conducted
between September 21 and 23, it was realized that the Soviet fleet was already
neutralized. The Tirpitz attack was called off
and the battleship returned to Gotenhafen. Through the fall Tirpitz
continued to run exercises in the Baltic. On November 13, 1941 Hitler met with
Admiral Raeder who suggested the movement of Tirpitz to Norway in order to
attack the Murmansk convoys as well as protect against a British invasion of
Norway, for which there were numerous rumors. Hitler granted the suggestion with
the caveat that the ship not attack any convoy escorted by an aircraft carrier.
Operation Polarnacht was the movement of Tirpitz
to
Norway
and was well named as indeed Tirpitz
moved into the realm of polar nights, long in the winter, short in the summer.
On January 15, 1942 Tirpitz
left
Germany
for the last time. She pulled into Faetenfjord near
Trondheim
. Camouflage measures were immediately taken in hand in order to make the
anticipated British air attacks more difficult. The British knew of the
deployment through Ultra intercepts but because of the successful camouflage and
short days could not initially find the battleship. For the RAF only four engine
heavy bombers had the range to reach
Trondheim
. The first attack was launched on the night of January 29, 1942 and in the
course of the spring five attacks with a combined total of 155 Halifax,
Sterling
and
Lancaster
bombers, all with no damage to Tirpitz.

Tirpitz Specific Shelter Deck - B Sprue |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Operations of Tirpitz
out of
Norway
were hampered by low fuel supplies. Tirpitz planned to attack
convoy PQ8 in late January but this was cancelled for lack of fuel. In February Tirpitz
was placed on alert to support Operation Cerberus. This was the channel dash of Scharnhorst,
Gneisenau
and Prinz
Eugen from
France
, through the English Channel, back to
Germany
. If the British fleet came out of
Scapa Flow
, Tirpitz
would support the older battleships. The British were caught flat-footed and
only responded with air attacks, so Tirpitz
stayed in
Norway
. On February 24, 1942 Tirpitz
raised the flag of Vice Admiral Ciliax as commander of Group North, initially
consisting of Tirpitz, Admiral Scheer
and Prinz
Eugen, although the later was not operational due to a submarine
torpedo hit on her journey to
Norway
.
In early March 1942 Tirpitz and three destroyers
sortied to intercept convoys PQ-12 and QP-8. Ultra intercepts informed the
British of the operation so the convoys’ courses were moved and Tirpitz
just missed contact. Steaming back to
Trondheim
Norway
Tirpitz
was attacked unsuccessfully by torpedo bombers from Victorious.
It took until June for enough fuel stocks to be accumulated for another sortie.
This time the target was convoy PQ-17. Thirty-four merchant ships had left
Iceland
on June 27, bound for
Russia
. Tirpitz,
Scheer,
Lutzow,
Hipper
and destroyers sortied to intercept. The British knew of the large German
movement and an anxious Admiral Dudley Pound,
First
Sea
lord, prematurely ordered the convoy to disperse. Although Tirpitz
and other surface ships were recalled on July 5, U-Boats and the Luftwaffe
picked off 21 of the now defenseless merchants. The very threat of Tirpitz
at sea was the proximate cause of the destruction of the convoy. That summer Tirpitz
moved her base of operations from
Trondheim
to Narvik, further north and out of RAF range. The ship needed an overhaul but
Hitler mandated that she stay in
Norway
, so
Trondheim
was slowly equipped for this process. In late October, with the shortening
days, Tirpitz was rebased at
Trondheim
. At this time the British launched an attack upon Tirpitz
with a Norwegian fishing cutter carrying two Chariot human torpedoes. They were
lost in a storm and the boat was scuttled before they could close
Trondheim
. The overhaul was conducted in stages, so Tirpitz
would be immobilized only for short periods of time. With work completed on
December 28, 1942 Tirpitz started a series of
trials reaching into January.

Superstructure & AA - C Sprue |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Scharnhorst
joined Tirpitz
and since there were no Russian convoys in the first half of the year, the pair
was ordered to attack allied facilities on the
island
of
Spitzbergen
. On September 8, 1943 Tirpitz
fired her main guns at an enemy target for the first time and all land targets
were destroyed. Another RN underwater attack on Tirpitz
was scheduled for 20 to 25 September. In Operation Source ten X-Craft midget
submarines were towed to
Norway
by ten submarines to attach two-ton mines to the hull of Tirpitz.
On September 22 two of the craft, X-6 and X-7, penetrated the anchorage and laid
four mines underneath the battleship. Damage included hull tears, some warpage,
intrusion of 1,500-tons of seawater and significant equipment damage. Dora had
lifted off its roller track and came back down off the track and jammed. Damage
to the turbines and their foundations immobilized the ship. Now it was
impossible for the Tirpitz
to return to
Germany
for repairs and these undertaken at
Trondheim
by the repair ship Neumark. Repairs were started
in November and not concluded until February 1944. Tirpitz
underwent a new series of trials to validate the repairs in March and April.
The Royal Navy had watched the repair work on Tirpitz
and when the Neumark
left, scheduled a new attack of Tirpitz
by the Fleet Air Arm (FAA) in Operation Tungsten. On April 3, 1944 a combined
strike of 40 Barracudas from Victorious,
Furious,
Emperor,
Searcher,
Fencer
and Pursuer
was launched in two waves. The aircraft caught the Tirpitz unprepared. Escorting
Corsairs and Hellcats machine-gunned the ship as the Barracudas dropped 1,600-lb
bombs. The operation was one of the best-executed missions of the FAA during the
war. Fourteen bombs hit the ship, causing serious damage. Further FAA attacks
during the late spring were cancelled because of cloud cover, or else were
unsuccessful because of the smoke screen over the ship. The culmination of the
carrier assault on Tirpitz
came in late August. Operation Goodwood called for attacks on August 22, 24 and
29. Two further hits were scored but on the whole the operation was foiled by
smoke screens over the target. It was decided that the ordnance carried by
British naval bombers were just not powerful enough to put down the Tirpitz.
Something bigger was needed.

Superstructure & AA - C Sprue |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Actually the Avro Lancaster heavy bomber was first used against the Tirpitz
in attacks in spring 1942. In 1942 the aircraft had no more success than other
aircraft types used against the battleship. However by 1944 a new weapon was
available. This was the 12,000 lb “Tallboy” bomb filled with Torpex. The
Lancaster
was the perfect platform to carry this oversize ordnance. In the summer of 1944
Tirpitz
was still anchored at Kaafjord and was just outside of the combat range of the
Lancaster
carrying the new ordnance. It was decided to use a Russian base to stage the
first attack upon Tirpitz
utilizing the new weapon. This meant that all aircraft and ordnance would have
to be ferried to
Russia
first. The base selected was at Yagodnik just south of
Murmansk
. The 9th and 617th Squadrons were selected for the
mission and 38
Lancasters
and 5 reconnaissance Mosquitoes left on September 11 for Operation Paravane.
One turned back and six crashed on landing. The raid was set for September 15.
Twenty
Lancasters
carried Tallboys, while seven carried mines. The attack was detected before the
bombers arrived over the Fjord and smoke generators quickly obscured the target.
Seventeen of the Tallboys were dropped but only one hit the target. Nonetheless
this one bomb proved the power of the new weapon. It passed through the bow of Tirpitz
and detonated on the floor of the fjord. The pressure wave generated by the
explosion tore a 55-feet by 35-feet hole in the lower hull of the battleship.
The entire bow of the ship from Anton barbette to the cutwater suffered severe
structural damage. The forecastle was warped, fuel tanks were cracked, machinery
was knocked of the mounts and forward compartments were flooded. This one hit
basically ended the operational career of Tirpitz. With the extensive
bow damage, she could not safely exceed 10-knots in speed. Since most of the
damage was internal or below the waterline, follow up British reconnaissance
missions failed to detect any significant damage from this raid.
Tirpitz
could not be adequately repaired in
Norway
so her career as flagship of Kampfgruppe 1 ended and Rear Admiral Peters
lowered his flag from the masthead. The hull received a temporary patch and
October 16 the Tirpitz
put to sea her last time. She limped
northward at 8 knots until she reached Tromso, where she anchored next to
Haakoy
Island
in shallow water. Since the Admiralty still considered the Tirpitz
fully functional, a new strike was planned. With new overhauls for all engines
and stripping the aircraft of all excess weight in a manner similar to
Doolittle’s B-25s, the Lancasters could barely reach Tromso from a base in
Scotland, which was a far better solution than the previous attack from a
Russian airfield. On October 29 Operation Obvite kicked off with 19
Lancasters
sent out. Low cloud cover obscured the anchorage but the aircraft bombed
through cloud breaks. Although there were no direct hits, the anti-torpedo nets
were shattered and several bombs landed close enough to Tirpitz
to further damage the battleship. One propeller shaft was damaged and the shaft
housing was flooded. Still, externally the damage was not apparent. Two Tallboy
raids and there still was no obvious damage that could be discerned by the
British, even though in reality there was severe damage. There had to be another
go at the Tirpitz. On November 12, 1944
32
Lancasters
of the 9th and 617th Squadrons headed across the
North Sea
in Operation Catechism. Weather was good and the bombing accuracy was
spectacular. Hits were registered on the forecastle, quarterdeck, aft of the
stack, catapult, bridge, Bruno turret, starboard hull
side as well as several near misses. The Tirptz
was shattered but still afloat, however, she was doomed. Twenty minutes after
the attack the magazine for Caesar turret exploded. A hole 117 feet in length
instantly appeared below the waterline in a matter of seconds thousands of tons
of water entered the ship. There was no way for damage control to manage
something this catastrophic. Tirpitz
was listing at 40 degrees to port in minutes and abandon ship order was issued.
In another two minute the list reached 70 degrees. She hit the shallow fjord
bottom as she was still turning over. The hulk was leisurely dismembered after
the war.

Secondary & Tertiary - D Sprue |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Dragon
Premium Edition Tirpitz
Sprue A - Main Deck and
Lower Hull
– These are the same parts found in the Dragon
Bismarck
kits. There are only four parts on this fret but they are large. Included are
the forward main deck, aft main deck, starboard underwater hull and port
underwater hull. I used the 1:400 plans in the AJ Press Bismarck/Tirpitz volumes
to compare the details on the plastic parts with the detail on the line
drawings. There was a pretty close match, but not quite. On the forecastle the
forward tip comes to a sharp point whereas plans show the tip had a slight
rounding at the top of the cutwater. Bollard placement appeared to match but the
kit did not have deck edge open chocks. Deck detail on the kit is nevertheless
good. On the kit the deck edge hawse are nicely done. The kit does have the
metal plate chain bases and the anchor chain is part of the detail included.
Some may want to sand this off and add their own metal anchor chain. One thing
you will instantly notice are the breakwaters. There are two forward, a flat
base V in front of A barbette and two wing breakwaters flanking each side of B
barbette. Both of these are equipped with the same features. These breakwaters
have great detail with all of the numerous support gussets on the rear face and
various fittings abutting the forward face. As with any plastic part, the
plastic detail is on the thick side. Plastic will never achieve the ultra thin
appearance of such features, as can be achieved with resin or photo-etch. Boat
chocks are on the deck on each side of the forward superstructure. As with the
breakwaters, they are a little bit thick but most modelers will place ship's
boats on top of them. The DML forecastle did not have quite all of the fittings on the
forecastle before and aft of A barbette as shown in the plans but did have most
of it. The molded on cable reels are too thick and some may wish to replace
these with photo-etch versions. On the quarterdeck piece there are many details,
although as in case of the forecastle, more fittings are shown on the 1:400
plans. Bollards match number and locations but again, there are no deck edge
open chocks. There are five cable reels between the turrets, which conforms in
quantity with the plans
but doesn't conform in exact locations. It appears that most of the deck
fittings left off are access hatches, which of course can be added with brass
photo-etch.
When
I looked at the hull halves, I immediately noticed numerous plates and fittings
on the lower hull, which surprised me. I in common with any others always
assumed that lower hulls were relatively smooth and featureless, except for the
occasional underwater torpedo tube opening. However, the DML Tirpitz had quite a number of
slightly raised plates of all types of sizes included as part of the molded on
detail. The 1:400 scale plans did confirm the presence of those fittings,
although I still don't know their purpose. From the slant of the underwater
portion of the cutwater to the graceful curves of the centerline shaft housing
the lines of the lower hull matched the plans with one possible exception. The
centerline curve at the aft end of the lower hull appears to be a tad more
gradual than that shown in the plans. As is true with any plastic kit, the bilge
keels are too thick.
Sprue
B - Shelter Deck and Forward Superstructure - Sprue B actually comprises two sprues both labeled B
and is Tirpitz specific. Dragon
took a different approach than other producers. DML
produced a one piece shelter deck specifically as carried by Tirpitz
with shelter deck extensions to deck edge in front of the torpedo tubes. Since
the Revell Tirpitz kit, other producers
have included the same shelter deck as their
Bismarck
version with the addition of deck extension cutouts. The Tirpitz
specific shelter deck from Dragon
eliminates this aggravation. The long shelter deck piece is nicely done. The
presence of metal none slip grid plates was immediately apparent as the grid
pattern is molded on detail. However most of this piece has the same deck plank
detail as found on the forecastle and quarterdeck. For the various gun
positions, curved metal plates extended beyond the deck edge and overhung the
main deck. Dragon has really captured
these, including the tread pattern. Another item that will instantly grab your
attention is the catapult. This feature was an open lattice grid and of course
plastic molding shows this as solid. The lattice detail is there but of course a
solid plastic piece will never be as nice in appearance as the open lattice
appearance of photo-etch. Many modelers may wish to remove the plastic catapult
and add photo-etch. There are AA positions behind B barbette and in front of Y
barbette. These were surrounded by solid splinter shields. These shields,
although too thick, match the shape of the forward positions but not the aft
positions. There are some nice details on the barbette sides but minimal detail
on the bulkheads of the shelter deck sides. There are no portholes, no doors, no
ladders, no piping, and no louvers. There is a reason for this lack of detail on
the plastic parts, Dragon has included superb brass bulkheads in the included
photo-etch fret to attach the plastic bulkheads.

Superstructure & Turrets - E, F, & G
Sprues |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The pieces for the
base of the forward superstructure/tower are just the opposite. They are covered
with detail. Louvers, doors, portholes and other detail is present. Incredibly,
the portholes even have molded on eyebrows. This may be a first, as I don't
recall ever seeing a mass produced injection molded ship in 1:700 scale have
this item of detail. The stack platform, different than
Bismarck
, is included on this sprue which is nicely done with grid tread platform on the
top and support ribs on the bottom surface. The Tirpitz
specific stack top is also included. This has nice piping but the open clinker
screen pattern is too thick. The aft upper superstructure, small vision devices,
vision tubs, main mast and torpedo tubes and other Tirpitz
specific pieces are included.
Sprue
C - Upper Superstructure & Light AA Guns – This sprue is identical to that in the DML
Bismarck
kits. Some of the upper structure parts are on this sprue. They include the 02
level for the aft superstructure, roof for the main mast deck house and two
levels of the forward tower. All of these superstructure parts have very good
detail. The aft 02 level has square windows, ventilation louvers, ammunition
boxes, and inclined ladders molded into the bulkheads. I personally would remove
the plastic inclined ladders and use photo-etch. The deck house roof upon which
the mainmast attaches has framework and chocks for four of the ship's boats.
Both levels of the forward tower have commendable upper and lower detail. They
feature intricate supports underneath the platforms and nice detail on top.
Almost all of the light AA guns for the ship are included on this sprue. These
include the 4.1-inch twin barrels, twin 20mm guns and single 20mm guns. The
4.1-inch barrels are good, the twin 20mm are OK if somewhat plain and the single
20mm guns are too thick. Oddly, the twin 20mm barrels are thinner than the
single barrels. You may wish to consider brass 20mm replacements, especially for
the single guns. Other parts included on the sprue are nice range finders,
propeller shafts, open cranes, bridge wings, stack platform cranes, rudders,
director covers, and foremast. Although the cranes are not blocks of plastic and
have open lattice work, it of course can not be as fine as photo-etch. One error
on this sprue is providing
Bismarck
design navigation wings for Tirpitz.
These wings would extend outward when in use and fold flush with the
superstructure sides when not used. The pattern varied between
Bismarck
with solid support ribs and Tirpitz
with an open lattice supports. DML
provides the
Bismarck
pattern. You can cut these off but then you would have to add the lattice
supports. However, these are found on some third party photo-etch releases in
1:700 scale.

Clear Parts, Stand & Hull - H, I, &
J Sprues |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sprue
D - Armament & Fittings
– Identical
to the
Bismarck
kits. The 15-inch gun barrels,
5.9-inch secondary turrets and guns and 3.9-inch mounts are found on this sprue.
The 15-inch barrels are separate and are designed so that each barrel can be
fixed at different angles. The secondary turrets are nice with guns in pairs, so
unlike the main guns, they cannot be trained separately. There are an assortment
of other fittings included here. The search lights might have over-scale
shudders but I rather like the detail. The crane bases show the lattice detail
incised to a high degree but are not open. Windlasses, as with the searchlights
have fine detail. Anchors and propellers are found here and the propeller blades
are all of the same design instead of have port and starboard blades canted in
opposite directions. The anchors can be further augmented and enhanced by
additional brass parts found on the included fret. Also included are a number of
solid accommodation ladders. Don't use these. Replace them with photo-etch.
Sprues
E & F - Superstructure and Stack - Sprue E seems to be the same as the
Bismarck
Premium Edition. These parts are shown on the side of the box as new tooling
for the
Bismarck
Premium. There are nine parts to sprue E. The biggest is an extremely nice
aircraft hangar with a very fine level of detail on the door. The hangar sides
are separate pieces with slide molds so that the bulkheads can have a higher
level of detail than a one-piece molding. The halves to the upper forward tower
are included an feature open portholes. Sprue F contains newly designed parts
for this release. It includes the main bridge with separate slide mold
bulkheads, stack halves, peaked deck houses with separate end doors, and two
separate boat frames. New parts include new director cupolas with shielding. As
with sprue E parts, these parts are excellent with a universally high level of
detail.
Sprues
G, I & J - Main Turrets,
Upper Hull
& Stand –
The main gun turrets have one difference from those of the DML
Bismarck,
B turret has the AA gun platform carried only by Tirpitz. These turrets are
rather nice and although the rivet heads are over-scale, they certainly add a
level of extra detail and interest to these turrets. There are also access doors
on the rear face of each turret, as well as molded on vertical ladders going up
the sides of the turrets. The upper hull is listed as sprue J. The upper hull
appears to follow the 1:400 scale plans very well with one major exception. A
count of portholes starboard forward confirmed that the quantity and location of
these on the model corresponded with those on the plans. However, the port side
lacks forward portholes. I first noticed this on the DML
standard Tirpitz
release and thought that I had just gotten an error. However, with this same
glaring error in the Premium Edition release, I can only assume that it is
present in all of the DML Tirpitz
kits but not their kits of
Bismarck
. The portholes can be drilled with a pin vice but the modeler shouldn’t have
to resort to this. I can only hope that Dragon
cures this defect on their mold. The hull sides at the aft end are especially
busy. There are numerous portholes, a stern anchor well on the port side, as
well as other detail. DML includes
cross bracing to maintain the form of the hull if the model is built full hull.
However, these must be removed if the model is built in waterline format. Sprue
I is simply the stand for the full hull model, as well as nameplates.
Sprue
H - Clear Plastic Parts for Arados and Ship's Boats
- Sprue
H is of clear plastic. I really like the use of clear plastic for these parts.
It adds an extra touch to have clear canopies on the aircraft and clear windows
on the ship's boats. There are two Arado floatplanes with each plane composed of
four pieces, One is the combined fuselage and wings, with two floats and a
propeller. There are 14 ship's boats on the sprue. Four are open boats with no
glass but ten have cabins or windshields. Six paravanes round out the parts
found on the sprue.
Brass
Photo-Etched Fret -
If you have any of the previous Premium Edition Dragon kits, you'll have noticed that one of the upgrades that DML
provides in the upgraded kit is a brass photo-etched fret. With the DML
Premium Edition Tirpitz,
the parts on this fret make a big difference. As mentioned, the sides of the
shelter deck were smooth, with no bulkhead detail. The reason for this is found
on the brass photo-etch fret. Dragon provides four absolutely gorgeous brass bulkheads for the
shelter deck sides. These parts are extraordinary. Not only do the open
portholes have eyebrows but also you can see the hinged porthole cover below the
opening. There are cutouts for the parts to fit over any side fittings, pipes,
life rings and ladders. These parts are fully relief-etched and are fully equal
to the best in the industry. Since brass and plastic will expand and contract at
different rates with changes in temperature, it might be best to attach the
brass bulkheads to the plastic with a glue with some flexibility, White glue
would probably provide more flexibility than super glue. The roof of the forward
end of the bridge is also provided in brass and has detail not found on the
plastic bridge. This part differs from that in the Premium
Bismarck
in that it has the deck pattern for the quadruple AA gun mount carried by Tirpitz
over the bridge.
I
didn't like the molded on cable reels as I thought that they looked too chunky.
Well, Dragon has thoughtfully
provided delicate brass reels as substitutes. There are actually 22 of these in
three different sizes vs 18 in the Premium
Bismarck
. Simply cut off the plastic reel and attach the brass version at the now vacant
position. There are substitute brass forward anchors of double thickness with
separate cross piece for each anchor. There is a main mast yards piece that will
be far better than the plastic one in the kit. Three brass radar arrays are
provided. DML provides railing but it
is not sufficient for the entire ship. No railing is provided for the main deck.
However, there is a full set of railing in different patterns for every deck and
platform from the shelter deck upwards.
Decal
Sheet -
Dragon provides a full decal sheet, as well as two other paper
items. The decal sheet is Tirpitz
specific. Instead of the large white deck circles for
Bismarck
there are two sets of deck flag markings, one set for centerline placement and
one set for deck edge placement. Which set you use depends upon the camouflage
scheme worn by the Tirpitz at the time. When you
look at the decal sheet, you are struck by omissions. The white circle within
the flags do not have swastikas and the naval ensigns are equally lacking the
swastika, just a vacant white circle in the middle of the red flag. Since some
countries prohibit decals with the nazi emblem, Dragon does not have it directly on the main decal. However, the
swastikas are there, they are just deconstructed to black L shapes and straight
lines. To add these onto the flags or deck circles, you have to assemble the
design, piece by piece. The sheet winds up with black crosses for the wings and
fuselages of the Arados but the swastikas for their tails have to be pieced
together from the separate small L-shaped arms found on the sheet. Another sheet
is a label sheet with two adhesive labels for the nameplates.
Instructions - The
Dragon Premium Edition Tirpitz
comes with the standard DML
instructions. There is one large, back printed sheet that folds to give eight
pages. Page one provides a schematic of all of the plastic and brass parts.
Almost all parts are used but there are a few that are not used. They are shaded
in blue and is for the
Bismarck
model. Pages two through six provide assembly of the kit in eleven steps.
Optional parts are indicated with brass parts designated as a "MA"
part in the instructions. Page seven and eight simply shows the camouflage
scheme worn by Tirpitz in September 1943
with plan and profile Tirpitz sported many other
schemes but you’ll have to find the other schemes elsewhere.
Verdict
The Dragon Premium Edition Tirpitz
in 1:700 scale is an excellent kit but one that is marred by one significant
omission. With Tirpitz
specific parts and inclusion of all eight C/37 4.1-inch gun mounts, Dragon
got the specifics right but omitted the portholes on the port bow.
 |
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
|