History
The Brooklyn class light cruisers were the U.S. Navys first attempt at a
"treaty light cruiser", a direct result of the London
Treaty of 1930. In effect, this treaty banned the construction of heavy
cruisers, on which the U.S. Navy had previously focused its construction efforts. As the
US Navy studied feasibility of small cruisers, they felt that this compromise was
unacceptable, and the Brooklyn design started off from where the New Orleans class heavy
cruisers left off. The ships ended up as a totally revised design, being the source of all
subsequent U.S. cruiser designs up to the Des Moines class. Probably the most noticeable
feature of the class is the gun layout, an unprecedented fifteen 6" guns in five
turrets, three forward and two aft.The USS Nashville
herself led a very eventful life. Commissioned in 1938, the ship spent most of her
American career in the Pacific War Zone. Highlights of these four years include being the
flagship of General MacArthur for the first parts of the Philippines invasion, and taking
part in the "liberation" of Shanghai in late 1945. Sold to Chile following WW2
and re-named Capitan Prat, Nashville served for many years in the Chilean Navy. For her
WWII service she earned 10 battle stars, more than any other Brooklyn class cruiser.
Vital Statistics


USS Nashville
Displacement: 9,767 tons; 12,207 tons full load
Length: 608'4" oa, 600' wl; Beam: 61' 9"
Range: 10,000nm @ 15 kts; Top Speed: 32.5 kts
Armament (as built): Fifteen 6" (5x3); eight 5"(8x1)
Torpedoes: none
Aircraft: four, Catapults: 2
Complement: 868 |
The Model
Iron Shipwrights 1/350
USS Nashville model is a two-part
full hull representing the ship from 1943 to late 1944. The hull castings themselves were
very clean, with only a few pinholes in the cast-in deck vents. There was about a
1/8" overpour on the upper hull, which had to be sanded off. This is no problem for
anyone experienced with flat sanding. The superstructure and guns are all cast in resin,
with minimal overpour. Some of the smaller parts had air bubbles wrecking them, but Iron
Shipwrights generally gives you more than you need. Two etched brass sheets are included
with the kit: one for Nashville specific details, and one for railings and ladders.
Unfortunately, the brass is not relief etched, but as most ISW kits the majority of detail
is cast in, so this does not prove a problem.
On a side note, a couple of the superstructure levels were broken in shipping and were
replaced by Jon Warneke and Ted Paris with no questions asked. Jon also gave me a free set
of Kingfisher floatplanes to replace the kit supplied Seagulls, as I discovered that
Nashville carried Kingfishers during the period in which I chose to represent her.
Construction
Overall, construction proved fairly easy, with no real problems encountered. Much of the
superstructure is cast in to the hull, which cuts down on construction time considerably.
The various superstructure parts also had locators, which cut down on the guesswork of
positioning the levels.
To begin construction, I started with mating the upper and lower hulls. This is most
likely the hardest part of construction, as an error here can ruin an entire model. Once
these pieces are glued, they are not coming apart. I will not go into detail of mating the
pieces, as it has been covered in other articles at the "Warship Home" website.
After the hull is assembled, I fully paint it, which I will go into detail below. As a
general rule, I always start on the armament of a ship before the superstructure. For the
Nashville this consists of the 6" turrets, 5" mounts, 40mm mounts, 20mm mounts
and both main and secondary gun directors. In all of these assemblies, the only problems
encountered were with the 6" turrets and main battery directors. Since ISW uses resin
instead of white metal, the 6" barrels are prone to warpage. I ended up heating all
of the barrels and rolling them on a flat surface to straighten them before gluing them to
the turrets. For the main battery director, the problem encountered was with the Mk. 8
radar. I believe this assembly is over-complicated and extremely hard to accomplish. You
need to acquire plastic stock of different diameter to fold over the radar. Even after
acquiring this, I could not get the radar to fit perfectly. I am pleased with the final
result though.
Photos of Nick
Wellington's Completed USS Nashville
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Instead of adding the superstructure level by level, I find that it is much easier to
complete each sub-assembly first and add them all at the time. Which you start on first
does not really matter, but I chose the forward superstructure. The deck levels go
together effortlessly, with much more time being spent on actually cleaning them up and
painting. For a ship of this size, the Nashville has surprisingly few sub-assemblies. This
in part is due to the cutting down of superstructure size for weight reductions. In total,
the sub-assemblies consist of the forward superstructure, the aft superstructure and
searchlight tower. All of these went together fairly easily with the exception of minor
fit problems on the searchlight tower, which required about 1mm of trimming on the resin
base. After these assemblies, all that needs to be added to the hull are the smokestacks
and aviation facilities. The stacks require extra care, as these are extremely easy to
misalign, which I learned first hand!
As I already mentioned, there are no real problems posed in the actual construction of
the kit. This is not to say that construction is totally straightforward. Almost all of
the problems I encountered were actually due to the instructions, which could be improved.
As a plus, they do have templates of both masts, but they leave out such things as the
motor whaleboat placement, two Mk.51 director tubs, and the correct catapult arrangement.
To rectify this, I strongly urge anyone buying this kit to purchase the Floating Drydock
plans. They will simplify construction greatly. The way I see it, what is an extra $15
after youve spent $200 on a resin model!
Painting
Painting of the USS Nashville was perhaps the most difficult part of the modelling
process. It is not the actual painting that was hard, it was the fact that I chose to
paint the ship in an obscure paint scheme that as far as I can tell is undocumented. For
most of her wartime career, the ship was painted in Ms. 21: all vertical surfaces navy
blue and all horizontal deck blue. For a short time in 1944 the ship was painted in Ms.
31/21D, a modified destroyer pattern, with ocean grey in place of the original dull black.
Thankfully, Jon Warneke emailed me the original pattern to work from, but I still had to
find as many pictures as possible. With all of this, I drew up what was most likely the
pattern, although many liberties were taken, especially on the deck, which might or might
not have carried the deck blue/ocean grey scheme. You can use the pictures of my model as
a template, but be warned that they are not necessarily accurate!
For the actual painting, I used Polly Scale USN colours. While not totally accurate, I
like the paint itself and am horrible at mixing my own colours. Most of the pattern is
conducive to masking, but the deck had to be treated differently. I tried masking, but
could not get it to work. Instead, I airbrushed as close to the pattern as possible, then
touched up the edges with a small paintbrush. You cannot tell I did this upon close
inspection, and even if you could its a wood deck, colour variations can be
expected!
Summary
Overall this is a very good representation of a mid to late war Brooklyn class cruiser.
While the kit is not perfect, I would recommend it to any experienced modeller wanting to
build a ship of this class.
|