"The slab-sided Oslyabya, Admiral Felkerzam’s flagship, was the first to go. She had always appeared awkward and gawky in the water, like a crude child’s model hewn from a chunk of wood with bits of piping stuck in haphazardly for funnels, and her high, vulnerable sides made a fine target for the Japanese gunners. Kamimura’s cruisers had already leveled her decks to a blazing wasteland when the Asahi sent into her bows three twelve-inch shells, which peeled off the armor plating and let the sea come pouring into her hull."  

This passage is found at page 176 of The Fleet that had to Die by Richard Hough. More than thirty years ago I checked out this book from the library. It chronicles the eighteen thousand-mile journey, made by the Imperial Russian Navy’s Second Pacific Squadron, a motley collection of 42 warships that were mostly obsolete, slow and vulnerable. This gaggle of misfits left the port of Reval in the Baltic on October 11, 1904 and met it’s fate at the hands of the crack gunners of Admiral Togo’s Imperial Japanese Fleet on May 27, 1905 in the Straits of Tsushima. Since reading that book, I have been enthralled by the warship designs of the Imperial Russian Navy.

   VITAL STATISTICS

Laid Down: November 21, 1895  Launched: Peresvet-May 1898; Oslyabya-November 1898
Displacement:
12,693 tons  
Dimensions:
434 feet overall; 71 feet beam; 26 feet draught
Machinery:32 Belleville boilers; 15,000 ihp = 18 knots 
Armor:
Belt & Turrets- 9-5 inches, CT- 6 inches
Armament: 4x 10 inch; 11x6 inch; 20x11 pdr; 20x3 pdr; 8x1 pdr; 5x15 inch torpedo tubes 
Complement:
752

Model makers have neglected these designs for years. Now they are coming into their own, reproduced in resin. Both WSW and WEM have produced a model of the cruiser, Askold (click here for a comparative review). ICM has announced a 1:350 styrene model of the Second Pacific Squadron’s flagship, Kniaz Souveroff. Two other companies, Modelkrak from Poland, and especially Kombrig from Russia have produced models of a great number of the Russian ships of the Russo-Japanese War. This review compares and contrasts the models of two sisterships, Peresvet by Modelkrak and Oslyabya by Kombrig.

Oslyabya456A.JPG (30171 bytes) Peresvet427.JPG (24441 bytes) Oslyabya477.JPG (32583 bytes) Peresvet425.JPG (29176 bytes)

When laid down, Peresvet, the lead ship of the class, was said to be a new type of battleship, one with speed. The Royal Navy bought the propaganda and designed a battleship class, the Duncans, to match the Russians. The Peresvet and sisters, Oslyabya and Pobieda turned out to be very poor designs. They were undergunned, lightly armored, of unexceptional speed and presented a very high silhouette for a target.

                                                                        REFERENCES

There are very few references available on this class in English. Warships of the
Imperial Russian Navy;Volume 1; Battleships
by V.M. Tomitch is the best reference in English that I've found. Privately published in 1968, this 102 page, soft cover book covers all classes of Russian battleships from steam powered ships of the line to the Imperial dreadnought classes of World War One. I obtained my copy from Pacific Front. Peresvet, issue 1/1998 in the Morskaya Kollektsia series is the best source that I have found on this class. It has 32 pages that include 55 photos, a two page plan and profile with sheer lines, 12 smaller drawings and full color covers, inside and out. The photos of the color schemes of the three ships of the class, found later in this article are from this title. Very highly recommended. The Russian Fleet of the Russo-Japanese War by Sergey Suliga is 56 pages of drawings of the ship classes of the Imperial Russian Navy, plus full color artwork on the cover, inside and out. Individual drawings of all three ships in the class are included. Both of the last two titles are in Russian.

When the Russo-Japanese War began, both Peresvet and Pobieda were stationed at Port Arthur, Russia’s port in Manchuria. After being bottled up in the harbor by the Japanese, they both suffered the same fate. Japanese Army eleven-inch siege mortars sank them. Peresvet took 23 hits and Pobieda 21. Both were subsequently raised an incorporated into the Imperial Japanese Navy, Peresvet as Sagami and Pobieda as Suwo. Peresvet has the distinction of being sunk twice. In 1915 Russia purchased her from Japan and recommisioned her as Peresvet. On January 4, 1917 after passing through the Suez Canal, she struck a mine ten miles north of Port Said and sank for the second and last time. Oslyabya, after a seven month, 18,000 mile voyage, was the first ship sunk at the Battle of Tsushima.

Peresvet424.JPG (43324 bytes) Oslyabya471.JPG (33994 bytes) Peresvet426.JPG (46308 bytes)

RESIN CASTING
The Modelkrak model of Peresvet is cast in cream colored resin and is of average hardness. It is easy to drill and modify with a hobby knife. The hull has a significant overpour that must be sanded to waterline. The Kombrig Oslyabya is cast in dark gray resin and the casting is clean and crisp. There was no overpour on the hull. However, the Kombrig resin is significantly harder than average. It took much more time and effort to deepen the portholes with a hand drill with the Kombrig kit than with the Modelkrak kit. Also the Kombrig resin is brittle. 

The three ships of the class had differences that distinguished them from each other. One difference was the support for the bridge wings. Peresvet was designed with support pillars under the end of the bridge wings, which I added with Evergreen plastic rod. Oslyabya had steel bulkheads that extended from the hull to support the wings. Each bulkhead had an opening for an eleven-pounder deck gun. Kombrig has nicely cast these bulkheads as part of the hull; however, they did not have the gun openings in the bulkhead. I had to drill a hole in each bulkhead and then expand it to the right shape with a hobby knife. This procedure worked fine on the starboard bulkhead but when I started using the knife to expand the port bulkhead, the bulkhead broke off the hull. Reattachment was not difficult but care and a light hand must be used if you wish to add the gun openings. The Kombrig kit has slightly better done deck detail. The skylights and hatches are crisply executed. However, there are no gun mounts for the eleven pounder and three pounder deck guns. The Modelkrak kit does have these mounts cast into the hull detail, with the exception of the two forward eleven-pounder positions one on each side of the bridge. Modelkrak also cast the unique rung ladders running up the sides of Peresvet as part of the hull casting.  These do not appear in the Kombrig kit. There is more deck detail included in the Modelkrak kit, than in the Kombrig kit. The Kombrig kit has Aztec steps cast into the hull or as separate parts for the inclined ladders. The Modelkrak kit has solid resin inclined ladders, either cast into the hull or as separate parts. With both ships I cut away the resin stairs and added brass inclined ladders from Tom’s two-bar rail set. I highly recommend doing this, as the fine brass inclined ladders add much interest and detail to the models.

Oslyabya452.JPG (59472 bytes) Peresvet431.JPG (57267 bytes) Oslyabya454.JPG (57767 bytes) Peresvet433.JPG (65843 bytes)

This class made use of quite a bit of solid splinter shielding instead of railing. The Modelkrak kit had this shielding where it was used in the prototype and no shielding where railing was used, except for the top platform of the masts, which had railing not shielding. The Kombrig kit had the shielding where the shielding was actually present but also where railing was used. The Kombrig shielding was also very fragile in that it is easily damaged and appears to be too short. Using a hobby knife I removed all of the splinter shielding from the Kombrig kit, except for the hull bulkheads. I used Evergreen strips for the shielding where it was present on the prototype. The class had twelve large distinctive boat davits amidships that are present in the Modelkrak kit but Modelkrak did not include the smaller davits found at the stern and bow. The large davits come in two lengths. Use the four longest for the center boat positions on each side and the eight shorter davits for the boat positions fore and aft of the center positions. The davits in the Kombrig kit are a trifle small and are only used on the fore an aft positions on each side.

Oslyabya472.JPG (48908 bytes) Peresvet428.JPG (59593 bytes) Oslyabya473.JPG (36808 bytes)

The Modelkrak kit has the conning tower but not the pilothouse. To create the pilothouse, I added Evergreen bulkheads and used 1:350 brass ladder for the pilothouse windows, which gave it a nice see-through look, rarely found on a 1:700 kit. The Modelkrak kit was also missing two small ventilators, which was fabricated from resin scrap. All of the parts for Kombrig’s Oslyabya were present and undamaged. Modelkrak did not have the bowchaser six-inch gun position. Use a hobby knife to start the hole for the gun barrel and then use a drill to deepen it. The prototypes had a fairly large bow crane used in hoisting the anchors. Although both kits had the crane railing cast into the deck, Kombrig included the crane and Modelkrak did not. The crane on the Peresvet model was built with sprue and resin scrap. The forward barbette on the Modelkrak kit is a little bit too close to the bridge. This can be remedied to a large extent by some judicious sanding but even then, the turret will sit a tad too forward on the barbette. Modelkrak includes torpedo net booms cast as part of the hull. I sanded these off and added the booms and net with plastic rod. The Modelkrak kit’s major parts have large casting blocks and significant sanding is required to remove them. Lastly the Modelkrak kit has what appears to be a thick belt of armor running along the waterline from cutwater to stern, which in scale, would be two feet of armor. Obviously Peresvet did not have such a belt. This belt also gives the Modelkrak kit too much beam.

Oslyabya474.JPG (48344 bytes) Peresvet429.JPG (41485 bytes) Oslyabya475.JPG (45705 bytes) Peresvet435.JPG (65812 bytes)

Neither kit comes with any gun barrels other than the main ten-inch guns, although Modelkrak does have the hull eleven-pounder guns cast into the hull. Plastic rod was used for the six-inch guns, for Oslyabya as well as Peresvet, and thinner stretched plastic sprue for the other eleven pounders. With the Kombrig kit, the hull eleven-pounders were added with stretched sprue. No three-pounder guns are provided in either kit. The deck three pounders had a gun shield so to duplicate these; I used WEM 20mm guns and shielding. Peresvet had eight one pounder guns in the fighting tops, four in the foremast top and four in the mainmast top. The Modelkrak fighting tops have the notches in the fighting tops where the one-pounders were positioned. Oslyabya only had the four one pounders in the foremast fighting top as she had a pole mainmast, as did Pobieda. The Kombrig fighting top did not have prototype notches in the top. Again I used WEM 20mm, this time without the shields, for the one-pounders on Peresvet and GMM 20mm on Oslyabya. For the deck three-pounders on Oslyabya, I used Tom’s 20mm, which were very easy to install. I again used Evergreen rod to duplicate the anti-torpedo net and booms on Oslyabya. I also added brass funnel gratings and the small platform on the boat deck of Oslyabya from the WEM fret for Askold. Tom’s two bar railing was used for both ships.

Oslyabya457.JPG (35155 bytes) Oslyabya455.JPG (55353 bytes) Peresvet440.JPG (62748 bytes) Peresvet423.JPG (36701 bytes)

INSTRUCTIONS
Kombrig has the better instructions. On one side the location for all of the parts are shown in the assembly diagram along with photos of all the small parts. The other side features a very nice plan and profile of the ship along with its history written in Russian. The plan and profile are in agreement with the plan and profile of Oslyabya found in Suliga’s volume on the Russian Fleet of the Russo-Japanese War. The Modelkrak plans are very rudimentary. Not all parts are shown in the instructions. It also has a plan and profile of Peresvet but is not quite as nice as the p&p in the Kombrig kit. The Modelkrak Peresvet seems to be an identical match for the plan and profile found in the center pages of the Morskaya Kollektsia title.

Oslyabya347instr.JPG (38121 bytes) Oslyabya346profile.JPG (26157 bytes) Oslyabya344plan.JPG (65749 bytes) Oslyabya345smallparts.JPG (58776 bytes)

PAINTING
I painted Peresvet as she originally appeared, in the pristine white Baltic scheme. She did not carry this scheme at Port Arthur, where she was painted in the same manner as Pobieda. I chose to paint Oslyabya, as she would have appeared at the start of her voyage to the East. She would have been heavily weathered at Tsushima, after the five-month voyage, with little time for touching up paintwork. I used Tamiya NATO black for Oslyabya, which is a dull black. Tamiya white was used for Peresvet.

Peresvet376.JPG (54739 bytes) Podieda374.JPG (63713 bytes) Oslyabya374.JPG (50390 bytes)

THE VERDICT
While neither kit matches the standards set by WSW, Hi-Mold, Samek, NNT, WEM or the other leading resin producers, both kits are solid values for the money. Both kits cost around US$35, which is substantially less than the same sized warship kits from the leading manufacturers. With a little work, both make very striking models. Between the Kombrig kit and the Modelkrak kit, I give the edge to Kombrig because of the crisp casting and minimal cleanup. Kombrig’s Oslyabya should be available from Pacific Front and NNT. Modelkrak’s Peresvet should be available from Pacific Front, Kitlink and NNT.

OslyabyaPer466.JPG (42575 bytes) OslyabyaPer465.JPG (49328 bytes) OslyabyaPer467.JPG (62559 bytes) OslyabyaPer447.JPG (41748 bytes)

The designs of Oslyabya and Peresvet, along with many other units of the Imperial Russian fleet, were directly influenced by French design theories. I find their appearance unique and intriguing. Visually, they have much more character and individuality than the business like; homogeneous, British built battleships of the Imperial Japanese Navy. I personally disagree with Richard Hough’s description of Oslyabya. Although she was vulnerable, with her high tumblehome sides, I find her very attractive.